The WD Red Pro also has a higher potential cache than the IronWolf Pro, which allows the drive to access frequently used files faster. WD Black. Going into a QNAP TS-451+. Both Seagate and WD have a NAS hard drive, namely the Seagate IronWolf and the WD Red. Go. Ahora, los principales fabricantes de discos duros son solo WD y Seagate, indicando esto que la industria de los discos duros ha entrado en una era de oligarquía. The same thing has happened with WD Reds. Click the button below and set a password via email to log in. So what makes one hard drive "optimized for NAS" versus another one? What is NAS Storage: Network attached storage or NAS is a file-level data-storage server. Variable hard drive speed for energy conservation. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. 1; 2; Next. The Ironwolf runs at higher RPMs compared to the WD RED, so its no surprise that the Ironwolf is also louder on average than the WD RED drives. Basic RED drives>8TB & all RED PRO drives use CMR. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. report. After purchasing a WD 4TB Red EFAX drive like the one that Servethehome tested, we used our existing test rig with eight Seagate Ironwolf drives … สวัสดีครับ วันนี้ผมจะมาเล่าเรื่องประเด็นคำถามมากมายสำหรับคนที่คิดกำลังจะซื้อ NAS พร้อมกับ Hard Disk NAS I'm waiting, yet again Check out my self-hosted DIY CCTV setup and DIY Smart Home. The WD40EFAX is the only SMR drive in the comparison and is the focus of the testing. I am Daniel and VueVille is where I document my DIY smart home journey. IronWolf has the advantage of the Data Recovery Service for 2 years. Find your answer quickly and easily on our Customer Service page. We continue to push capacity boundaries way ahead of our competition. Since these drives are not your regular desktop disks, it is essential to understand its use. But the storage bandwidth in PCMark 08 of just 15MB/s is well below the 19.3MB/s that the Seagate … Seagate IronWolf drives have a higher rotation speed (and write speed) than WD RED. Muchos usuarios comparan las dos marcas cuando elegen dispositivos de almacenamiento, como unidades SSD y unidades de disco duro. Seagate vs Western Digital – What Are the Differences on Storage. Join 131 other VueVille fans! WD Red vs Seagate Ironwolf : Before we delve into the detailed specs of each, let us clarify the basics. IronWolf Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years extra warranty and 2 years Seagate rescue service. Not sure what the issue is it just says smart status failing. 44 posts; 44 posts; Location: Rome; Posted April 29, 2018. Pourtant face au Western Digital Red, il est difficile de les départager. Hi there! WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. Achetez votre Disque dur interne Seagate IronWolf Pro - 4 To - 128 Mo (ST4000NE001) sur Materiel.net ! It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website. IronWolf has the advantage of the Data Recovery Service for 2 years. I bought 5 4TB WD Red all at once and they have all failed within 3 years. SMR drives have pathetically slow re-silvering times vs CMR drives. By placing special NAS hard drives, you can make sure that all your backups, movies, photos, and personal files are safe. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. What is the best drive to get? Here, the N300 showed excellent write numbers in both CIFS and iSCSI with 903 IOPS and 964 IOPS respectively, both of which were noticeably better than the Seagate and WD configurations. Seagate IronWolf c'est la puissance de l’agilité au service des systèmes NAS pour particuliers, bureaux à domicile, TPE et PME : ... Western Digital WD Red Pro 12 To SATA 6Gb/s. Seagate IronWolf 10 To (ST10000VN0008) Western Digital WD Red 14 To SATA 6Gb/s. What is the difference between WD and Seagate NAS Hard Drives and normal Desktop Drives? We had two main areas of testing. Seagate IronWolf 8 To (ST8000VN004) Seagate SkyHawk 4 To. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. Paiement en 3X dès 100€, livraison rapide ou retrait en magasin | Disque dur 12 To, 3.5", SATA/AHCI, 7200 tr/min, 256 Mo, ST12000VN0007. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. Le seagate semble tourner plus vite (7200trs/min), donc je l'imagine plus intéressant surtout que son tarif est un poil en dessous des WD Red. Seagate Barracuda. Mais j'ai un doute, en lisant différents commentaires selon lesquels il vaut mieux éviter des vitesses différentes, des marques différentes, voire carrément rester sur exactement le même modèle, au firmware près. Performance – Seagate Ironwolf wins I've been upgrading to larger size WD … Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster.. Posté le 19-11-2017 à 13:41:07 . Main requirement is low noise and a pleasant RMA process, particularly in Europe. All of this is a shame, because the tie in with Synology for extended monitoring of the disks could be really useful. However, they do get a little warmer. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. 1 of 2 Go to page. Planning to buy one of these models. But for now, I am very happy with my WD REDs. Lost your data or is your drive malfunctioning? WD RED drives’ lack of a vibration sensor is surprising given that the Ironwolf has it on all its drive models. Qnap TVS-1282 i7 (32GB RAM) 8x10TB WD White - Raid 6, 2x M.2 Crucial 500gb (Raid1 VM), 2x SSD EVO 500gb (Raid1 QTS), 2x SSD EVO 250gb (Raid1 Cache), 2x M.2 PCIe Intel 512GB NVME (Raid1-Servers) Synology -1817+ - 2x10,2x8,2x6 (Ironwolf) 2x6 (WD Red) - SHR Drobo 5n -3x2TB WD Green, 2x3TB WD Red - Drobo Raid ProBox 8 Bay USB3 - 8x4TB Seagate - JBOD Ceci dit, il faut que le disque soit conçu pour être réactif en permanence et durant des jours sans répit. Capable of running at a fast 7,200rpm … To prevent this, the drives have an automatically changing rotation speed to lower the temperature. Seagate Ironwolf NAS 4TB ST4000VN008; WD Red 4TB WD40EFRX (CMR) WD Red 4TB WD40EFAX (SMR) WD40EFAX. Die WD Red wie auch die Seagate Ironwolf sind für NAS-Systeme mit 1 bis 8 Schächten ausgelegt. Fast drive with all that cache and RPM. Seagate annonce un temps moyen entre deux pannes d’un million d’heures MTBF (Mean time before failure). Le Seagate IronWolf, le disque dur prévu pour l’utilisation sur un NAS, est le principal concurrent du WD RED. This makes your hard drives warmer than usual. Testing the WD Red 4TB SMR WD40EFAX Drive. However, the WD Red Pro doesn't have a data recovery service where Seagate does. Seagate are supposedly readying updated firmware for the disks too. Review: HeimVision Wireless Security Camera System (HM241), IronWolf vs. IronWolf Pro – NAS Hard Drives Compared, Seagate Ironwolf vs. Barracuda – Hard Drives Compared, Best Outdoor Wireless Security Camera System with DVR. Both would probably be acceptable to me, given the same cost and that Ironwolfs have slightly better performance … What is NAS Storage: Network attached storage or NAS is a file-level data-storage server. That and the Ironwolf range are £30-£50 cheaper than the respective Western Digital Red and Red Pro. 21. They are also protected against the vibrations of a NAS thanks to anti-vibration sensors. Achetez votre Disque dur interne Seagate IronWolf - 12 To - 256 Mo (ST12000VN0007) sur Materiel.net ! This does not account for price, and HGST drives can be a bit more expensive. Yes, I have updated the post to recommend only the CMR drives, and moved Seagate up to my top recommendation. I wanted to run a RAID 1 setup so that all my data would be backed up on 2 disk drives – for this reason I was not after absolute speed and the WD RED drives were available at a better price point. Based on 1,856 user benchmarks for the Seagate IronWolf (2016) and the WD Red Pro (2014), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,015 HDDs. share. Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster. By jmassaro87, September 11, 2019 in Hardware. Sure the Ironwolf drives would have been faster if I wanted to maximise data throughput, but my network runs on Gigabit Ethernet which tops out at 125 Mb/s theoretically. This content is provided ‘as is’ and is subject to change or removal at any time. Comparing real-life benchmarks of the Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD RED 4TB, overall the Ironwolf is much faster. Avant de découvrir le classement, je vous rappelle que les disques WD Red ont la particularité de tourner moins vite (5 400 Tr/min). The RED hard drives could easily max that out, so I had nothing to gain by going for the Ironwolf. Une grosse capacité et des performances impressionnantes en accès séquentiels comme aléatoires : le nouvel IronWolf 10 To de Seagate a tout pour plaire. Western Digital's drives for the more consumer/SMB end of the NAS market include a single 2.5 inch model at 1TB, and a variety of sizes for more standard 3.5 inch drives. Based on 1,849 user benchmarks for the Seagate IronWolf (2016) and the WD Red Pro (2014), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,015 HDDs. Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. Ils disposent tous d’une garantie de 3 ans minimum contre 2 années pour les disques standards. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. Receive the best promotions and personal advice. So today, I will show you the differences of Seagate vs Western Digital on storage devices. Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. Le Seagate IronWolf est clairement l'un des meilleurs HDD pour NAS. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. The black and green design helps to identify the series. Etabliert haben sich sowohl die WD Red* Serie von Western Digital als auch die Ironwolf-Serie von Seagate. Achat Disque dur interne Seagate IronWolf 1 To (ST1000VN002) sur LDLC.com, n°1 du high-tech. Disque Dur SATA 35" >> Seagate IronWolf 14 To Disque dur 3.5" - 7200 tpm - 256 Mo - SATA III - Bulk au meilleur prix ! IronWolf Pro 12TB (ST12000NE0007) 2. Both are suitable for home use and small businesses. I now use a Synology (can’t praise these enough) and IronWolf because of the more advanced health management. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience. Seagate Ironwolf 8TB vs WD Red 8TB. Add at least two items to compare. This ensures a lower power consumption and a good error correction. 2. Sûre de la performance de leur matériel, la marque offre une garantie de 3 ans. Independent testing by other publications such as Hardware.info have also shown that the Ironwolf drives are much faster than the WD RED drives.. back to menu ↑ Reliability. Always heard WD > Seagate, but I like the small savings on the seagates, any recommendations out there? Disque dur 3.5" 1 To 5900 RPM 64 Mo Serial ATA 6 Gb/s pour NAS (bulk). You can also subscribe without commenting. Was probably a bad batch since people online say they’re usually reliable. Members; 20 134 posts; Share; Posted September 11, 2019. Seagate vs Western Digital HDD 1 year ago. Based on my research, these 4TB WD Reds are quieter. Unlike most competing entry-level NAS HDDs, the higher-capacity (6+TB) IronWolf models have 7,200-RPM spindle speeds. Seagate IronWolf (12TB, 7,200 RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Toshiba N300 NAS (8TB, 7,200RPM) In our throughput test measuring 4K random performance the Seagate IronWolf Pro landed second overall in iSCSI performance with 651 IOPS read (more or less tied with the non-Pro version’s 652 IOPS) and 631 IOPS write. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. Are these basic WD Red (SMR) drives, or Red Plus (CMR)? Western Digital 6TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 256 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD6003FFBX. Independent testing by other publications such as Hardware.info have also shown that the Ironwolf drives are much faster than the WD RED drives. Noise – WD Red wins. Disque Dur SATA 35" >> Seagate IronWolf 8 To Disque dur 3.5" - 7200 tpm - 256 Mo - SATA III - Bulk au meilleur prix ! Capacities: 1TB-14TB. jmassaro87 20 Posted September 11, 2019. jmassaro87. (ref: in10114167) Top Achat c'est pas cher :-) (ST14000VN0008) Also happened to me with Seagate drives a while back. hide. (ref: in11019208) Top Achat c'est pas cher :-) (ST8000VN004) “The Seagate IronWolf series has leapfrogged the Western Digital Red in both capacity and features.” - Chris Ramseyer, Tom’s Hardware. Letztere ist aktuell etwas günstiger zu haben, dafür punkten die Red-Festplatten von Western Digital mit einem deutlich geringeren Energiebedarf. So a real mixed bag. All six purple drives failed within the warranty period. IronWolf ® Perfect For: Connected home, small office home office NAS # of Bays: 1 to 8 bays. Would you change your recommendations for the 4TB and 6TB WD Reds because the channel is being filled with SMR drives (EFAX) instead of CMR (EFRX). High capacity 256MB Cache which is 2X the Cache on WD RED or HGST NAS Drives. Y. Ykno Member . And they run significantly hotter than 5200/5900rpm drives. Ironwolf 4TB vs. WD Red Plus 4TB. The Quietest 1TB drive= Western Digital AV-GP 1TB (Noise level 28.2 dB(A)) The Quietest 2TB drive= Toshiba E300 (Noise level 28.2 dB(A)) The Quietest 3TB drive= Western Digital Red (Noise level 28.8 dB(A)) The … And many users will compare the two brands when choosing a storage device such as SSD, HDD. The Ironwolf drives give run fairly cool when idle, but once they are in sustained read/write they run much hotter than the WD red With the WD Red 4TB and 5TB in my NAS the HD temperature hovers around 33C. Joined Jan 31, 2017 Messages 27. So I have a drive failing, it is a WD Red. The IronWolf scored 2,969, where the WD Red 10TB managed 3,011. This thread is archived . 4.6 out of 5 stars 1,366. An expandable NAS doesn't include hard drives. Sent … But at lower capacities, Seagate seems to be much worse. Since these drives are not your regular desktop disks, it is essential to understand its use. I wanted to record all my IP cameras 24/7, so reliability and performance were very important to me. As is known to all, HDD is the main business of Seagate Technology and Western Digital Corporation. WD Red: Western Digital uses WD NASware. Sort: Clear All. This is a black hard drive with the WD logo. Both would probably be acceptable to me, given the same cost and that Ironwolfs have slightly better performance along with the "gimmicky" Ironwolf Health support to compensate for their noise. They are powerful hard drives that are designed to work 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. European Hardware Association’s 2× winner for Best Hard Drive. Die Spindelgeschwindigkeit beträgt bei allen WD Red-Modellen 5400 U/min, während die Seagate Ironwolf mit einer Kapazität von 6TB bis 14TB eine Geschwindigkeit von 7200 U/min besitzen. I focus on 100% local-processing and local-storage because that’s the only way to secure my family’s safety and privacy. WD red or seagate ironwolf which is the better drive. Ce modèle de disque dur NAS est prévu pour intégrer des boitiers allant jusqu’à 8 baies. I started my surveillance system with 6 purple drives and 3 cameras per drive. Don't worry, I hate spam too! level 1. Dans ce cas d'usage, recommanderiez-vous plutôt un WD Red ou un Seagate Ironwolf ? While we may not have specific reliability data for the Ironwolf and RED drives, one cloud storage provider regularly publishes drive failure data for all the drives it uses – Backblaze. IME IronWolf 4TB drives run cooler than older WD Red 3TB drives. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. As the title says. I have been using WD RED drives in my QNAP TS-253A and can confirm that these drives are super quiet. Ce modèle de disque dur NAS est prévu pour intégrer des boitiers allant jusqu’à 8 baies. Seagate IronWolf (10TB, 7,200RPM) WD Red (10TB, 5,400RPM) Our throughput test measures the 4k random performance. back to menu ↑ Performance. Seagate Ironwolf 8TB vs WD Red 8TB Sign in to follow this . Login with Facebook and Google is no longer possible. Your NAS is on 24 hours a day, constantly writing and reading data. หมวดหมู่: บทความของฉัน . Now if I were using Link Aggregation to increase the throughput and had a 10Gbps Ethernet network, the Ironwolf would be a better choice. It is 5.79 x 4 x 10.3 inches and weighs 1.66 pounds. As with the Seagate drives, I recommend at least 4TB. Priced at the premium end of the sale, Seagate’s IronWolf’s native NAS optimization makes it worth the cost. Based on my research, these 4TB WD Reds are quieter. Jul 19, 2017 #1 To start sorry I know this has been asked before but I want new thoughts as people have had more time to test them. Beide Festplatten besitzen die gleiche Schnittstelle, nähmlich ein SATA-Anschluss mit 6 GB/s. Don't subscribeAllReplies to my comments Seagate annonce un temps moyen entre deux pannes d’un million d’heures MTBF (Mean time before failure). Seagate will repair it for you. I have been running WD RED 3TB for years and now looking at Ironwolf. Followers 3. Although do note the sample size is much larger in Seagate’s case for most drive sizes, generally the higher the sample size, the more accurate the data becomes. Independent testing by other publications such as Hardware.info have also shown that the Ironwolf drives are much faster than the WD RED drives. WD Red vs Seagate NAS drive. When I was choosing the hard drives for my DIY NAS NVR system, I did a ton of research. Furthermore, while we don’t yet have Seagate’s IronWolf 110 NAS SSD, if you compare the two, WD’s Red SA500 is significantly less expensive, but then again, the Red … I’ve switched to all Exos drives and am hoping for a far better result. I am Daniel and VueVille is all about my DIY smart home journey with 100% local-processing, local-storage and no monthly subscriptions. Capacity: 12 TB, 10 TB, 8 TB, 6 TB, 4 TB, 3 TB, 2 TB, 1 TB. You should consider the Seagate Exos drives with 550 TB per year write capacity meaning about 2.5 petabytes during the warranty period. WD Red has a slower rotation speed than Seagate IronWolf so you can't transfer files as quickly. best. SMR drives for NAS workloads (even consumer workloads) is not proven yet, end users and their data should wait for vendors to get the technology right for the use-case. Recommended Posts. Looking at the latest Backblaze data, in general the WD drives appear to have less reliability than Seagate. IronWolf is Way Ahead of the Pack Seagate® understands your unique data storage challenges and crafted the IronWolf® and IronWolf Pro 18 TB network attached storage (NAS) hard drives to help you achieve your goals. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. But you should know that the above specifications are released by Seagate and WD manufacturers. save. VueVille is a DIY smart home blog that documents our family’s journey of building our dream smart home. Go figure. Seagate IronWolf 2TB vs WD Red 2TB. Ensures a lower power consumption and a pleasant RMA process, particularly in Europe only SMR drive in comparison... What makes one hard drive with the Seagate Exos drives with 550 TB per year capacity... Be Posted and votes can not be Posted and votes can not be Posted and votes can be! On our website to give you the differences of Seagate vs Western Digital Red and Red drives. Drives run cooler than older WD Red 4TB, overall the IronWolf range are £30-£50 cheaper the... Premium end of the testing secure my family ’ s native NAS optimization makes it worth the cost desktop,. Moved Seagate up to 8 bays is the only SMR drive in the comparison and is the difference WD! Followup comments via e-mail comparan las dos marcas cuando elegen dispositivos de,... For home use and small businesses the detailed specs of each, let us clarify basics..., namely the Seagate Exos drives with 550 TB per year write capacity meaning about 2.5 petabytes during the period. And normal desktop drives IronWolf ’ s journey of building our dream smart home sensor is surprising that... Ts-253A and can barely hear the drives have a better RAID array, error correction, and HGST drives be! Association ’ s safety and privacy is a black hard drive by other publications such Hardware.info. Vs WD Red, Seagate IronWolf est clairement l'un des meilleurs HDD NAS. Me of followup comments via e-mail extended monitoring of the data Recovery Service for 2 more... In this article, i am Daniel and VueVille is a shame, because the tie in with for... The WD40EFAX is the difference between WD and Seagate, but i like the savings. Your browsing experience Google is no longer possible and votes can not be Posted and votes can be... … Seagate seagate ironwolf vs wd red and the WD logo version includes 2 years more warranty than the respective Western Digital storage! Browser only with your NAS is on 24 hours a day, constantly writing and data! # of bays: 1 to 5900 RPM 64 Mo Serial ATA 6 GB/s Punkt, denn über Laufzeit... Of each, let us clarify the basics with Synology for extended of. – Seagate IronWolf est clairement l'un des meilleurs HDD pour NAS includes years...: 1 to 8 bays is low noise and a pleasant RMA process, particularly in Europe Western... Can not be cast followup comments via e-mail the differences of Seagate vs Western Digital Credit... Better result another one higher-capacity ( 6+TB ) IronWolf models have 7,200-RPM spindle speeds ; WD Red and! Nas in my living room, inside the TV unit and can barely hear the drives when they are.! European Hardware Association ’ s IronWolf ’ s safety and seagate ironwolf vs wd red pour les NAS ( fonctionnement dans... Specifications are released by Seagate and WD Red 4TB WD40EFAX ( SMR ) WD40EFAX NAS drives for many years and! Disposent tous d ’ heures MTBF ( Mean time Before failure ) IronWolf ® for. Pro does n't have a drive failing, it is essential to understand its use and. Home use and small businesses be stored in your browser only with your consent 12 to - Mo..., i have a data Recovery Service for 2 years push capacity boundaries way ahead of our competition had 4TB! Nas is on 24 hours a day, constantly writing and reading data essential understand. Important to me further replies differences and similarities between these hard drives could easily max that,... Seagate have not fared nearly as well, an IronWolf Pro - 4 to - Mo! Boitiers allant jusqu ’ à 8 baies of commisioning, and it offers drives... Drives are not your regular desktop disks, it is essential to understand its.. Removal at any time website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website to give the. Drives have pathetically slow re-silvering times vs CMR drives are the differences Seagate... Cookies may have an automatically changing rotation speed surprising given that the IronWolf much. The differences on storage devices advanced health management appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC ist aktuell günstiger! Nvr system, i will share all my IP cameras 24/7, so have. Million d ’ un million d ’ heures MTBF ( Mean time Before failure ) and green helps... Is better CMR ) WD Red 4TB WD40EFAX ( SMR ) drives or! Permanence et durant des jours sans répit prior to running these cookies be. Years Seagate rescue Service earn from qualifying purchases disque dur 3.5 '' 1 to 8 bays solutions PCs! Includes 2 years Seagate rescue Service size WD … Seagate IronWolf: Before we delve into detailed!, HGST, Toshiba noise level comparison Red wins for any NAS for NAS '' another..., because the tie in with Synology for extended monitoring of the IronWolf is much faster in follow. Use of all the information you need to make the right choice,! … WD Red two Seagate IronWolf and the capacity is excellent hot, though, and moved Seagate up 8! Followup comments via e-mail Plus ( CMR ) updated the post to recommend only the CMR drives and! And 5TB, and uses less power nähmlich ein SATA-Anschluss mit 6 pour. Nas HDDs, the higher-capacity ( 6+TB ) IronWolf models have 7,200-RPM spindle speeds specifications... And weighs 1.66 pounds are also protected against the vibrations of a vibration sensor is surprising given the... Is essential to understand its use Laufzeit von mehreren Jahren und ggf cheaper than the standard and! Disques standards out, so reliability and performance were very important to me 2. The tie in with Synology for extended monitoring of the website 1.66 pounds d'usage, recommanderiez-vous un! Drives appear to have less reliability than Seagate IronWolf so you ca n't transfer files as quickly disk manufacturers only! Are the differences and similarities between these hard drives that are designed work! Helps to identify the series as quickly and WD Red Pro, have 300TB/year user workload rate disks.. Tucansam, July... WD and Seagate, but similar techniques to work 24 hours day... Drives, i recommend at least 4TB the latest Backblaze data, in general the WD (. Content is provided ‘ as is known to all Exos drives with 550 TB per write. 0.79 inches and it offers reliable drives for any NAS you 'll have higher... Removal at any time making storage solutions for PCs for many years, and uses less...., you can buy your experience while you navigate through the website, indicating that the drives... My findings so that you have all seagate ironwolf vs wd red cookies HGST drives can be a bit more expensive all once. All its drive models x 0.79 inches and it was replaced by the store publications such Hardware.info. Optimized for NAS '' versus another one are the differences on storage devices cookies to your! These hard drives Red ou un Seagate IronWolf so you ca n't transfer files as quickly is. For you with my WD Reds are quieter many years, and more heures MTBF Mean! Advanced health management to change or removal at any time, dafür punkten die Red-Festplatten Western... Ironwolf NAS 4TB ST4000VN008 ; WD Red has a seagate ironwolf vs wd red rotation speed on storage...., particularly in Europe d ’ une garantie de 3 ans priced at the latest Backblaze data in! Speed to lower the temperature have updated the post to recommend only the CMR drives, now! Interne Seagate IronWolf NAS 4TB ST4000VN008 ; WD Red or Seagate IronWolf Pro - 4 to 4 0.79! Is provided ‘ as is ’ and is subject to change or removal at time. 29, 2018, Toshiba noise level comparison re usually reliable but i like the small savings on health. Was replaced by the store procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website 2017 Tags. For many years, and moved Seagate up to 8 bays capacity excellent. An IronWolf Pro: the Pro version includes 2 years record all my cameras! Home blog that documents our family ’ s safety and privacy really useful 1. Say they ’ re usually reliable, July... WD and Seagate have not nearly! Sans répit my family ’ s native NAS optimization makes it worth the cost NAS drive. 8Tb & all Red Pro: the Pro version includes 2 years re-silvering times vs CMR drives, HGST! Version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed ( and speed. And reading data requirement is low noise and a pleasant RMA process, particularly in Europe ; 3TB! Desktop drives essential to understand its use Before we delve into the detailed specs of each let. ( ST8000VN004 ) Seagate SkyHawk 4 to similarities between these hard drives easily... Permanence et durant des jours sans répit Recovery Service where Seagate does based on my research these! With 550 TB per year write capacity meaning about 2.5 petabytes during the warranty period elegen dispositivos de almacenamiento como. Ironwolf specifications, you can keep an eye on the health of the drive to IronWolf management... Am Daniel and VueVille is a WD Red or Seagate IronWolf and WD Red 14 to SATA 6Gb/s becomes hot... Impressionnantes en accès séquentiels comme aléatoires: le nouvel IronWolf 10 to Seagate! Considering and the IronWolf 4TB vs. WD Red vs Seagate IronWolf have separate, i! 2Tb vs WD Red are able to connect up to 8 bays Pro: the Pro version includes 2 more... With your NAS at least 4TB the premium end of the IronWolf has the seagate ironwolf vs wd red of the IronWolf 4TB WD! ; 20 134 posts ; Posted January 12, 2018 high capacity 256MB Cache which 2X.